Reform of AFDC quality control

hearing before the Subcommittee on Human Resources of the Committee on Ways and Means, House of Representatives, One Hundred First Congress, first session, May 8, 1989.
  • 114 Pages
  • 4.26 MB
  • 2033 Downloads
  • English
by
U.S. G.P.O., For sale by the Supt. of Docs., Congressional Sales Office, U.S. G.P.O. , Washington
Federal aid to child welfare -- United States -- Evaluation., Public welfare administration -- United States -- Evaluation., Aid to families with dependent children programs -- United St

Places

United States, United St

Classifications
LC ClassificationsKF27 .W3464 1989d
The Physical Object
Paginationiii, 114 p. ;
ID Numbers
Open LibraryOL1813405M
LC Control Number89603041

Get this from a library. Reform of AFDC quality control: hearing before the Subcommittee on Human Resources of the Committee on Ways and Means, House of Representatives, One Hundred First Congress, first session, May 8, [United States. Congress. House.

Committee on Ways and Means.

Details Reform of AFDC quality control PDF

Subcommittee on Human Resources.]. Amendments to the AFDC Quality Control Program: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Public Assistance and Unemployment Compensation of the Committee on Ways and Means, House of Representatives, Ninety-ninth Congress, First Session, on H.R.

to Amend Part A of Title IV of the Social Security Act J - Ebook written by United States. QUALITY CONTROL Quality control methods have been used to determine the accuracy of financial payments and eligibility criteria for AFDC services.

This federally mandated program was fully implemented in as a corrective action procedure to combat rising costs in public assistance.

The quality control system utilizes federal and state. Get this from a library. Recent studies of the AFDC quality control system and the need for reform: hearing before the Subcommittee on Public Assistance and Unemployment Compensation of the Committee on Ways and Means, House of Representatives, One Hundredth Congress, second session, Ap [United States.

Congress. House. Committee on Ways and Means. Reform of AFDC quality control: hearing before the Subcommittee on Human Resources of the Committee on Ways and Means, House of Representatives, One Hundred First.

Amendments to the AFDC quality control program: hearing before the Subcommittee on Public Assistance and Unemployment Compensation of the Committee on Ways and Means, House of Representatives, Ninety-ninth Congress, first session, on H.R.to amend part A of Title IV of the Social Security Act.

Get this from a library. AFDC quality control program: hearing before the Subcommittee on Public Assistance and Unemployment Compensation of the Committee on Ways and Means, House Representatives, Ninety-eighth Congress, second session, October 3, [United States.

Congress. House. Committee on Ways and Means. Subcommittee on Public Assistance and Unemployment. ex amined over five thousand "AFDC cases reviewed by Wisconsin quality-control personnel during the calendar years and " (Piliavin, Masters & Corbett, ).

They concluded that errors. Get this from a library. AFDC quality control program: hearings before the Subcommittee on Oversight of the Committee on Ways and Means, House of Representatives, Ninety-fourth Congress, first session, October 31 and November 3, [United States.

Congress. House. Committee on Ways and Means. Subcommittee on Oversight.]. A Brief History of the AFDC Program On Aug President Clinton signed into law the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act (PRWORA) of (Public Law –). PRWORA replaced the Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) program that had been in existence for 60 years.

retained to meet federal quality control requirements for the AFDC/CalWORKs Program (AFDC Quality Control Manual Section ) and for the CalFresh Program (FNS Quality Control HandbookChapter 5).

(All-County Letter (ACL) No. Octo. The Catalyst of Welfare Reform ­ AFDC's Growth. The key initiative was a new "quality control" system which threatened states with financial penalties for erroneous payments but not for erroneous application rejections or case closings.

This one-sided policy remained a mainstay of federal AFDC policy for the rest of AFDC's history.

Description Reform of AFDC quality control FB2

monthly AFDC plus food stamp benefits for a family of three varied from $ in Alabama to $ in Alaska. Table 1 presents some statistics about the AFDC program and its partici-pants. Inan average of million families participated in AFDC each month, receiving $ billion in state and federal benefits over the year.

The quality control plan must be approved before the start of the particular work. The contract requires that the QC testing lab be validated by the approved source (Institutions, consultant, competent testing house /firm or ).

Construction Quality Control Process.

Download Reform of AFDC quality control FB2

Evaluating Welfare Reform: A Framework and Review of Current Work so called "waiver" programs—state experiments with different types of AFDC rules—toward devolution of design and control of social welfare programs from the federal government to the states.

as well as general issues of data quality for studies of the low-income and. QCPolicyMemo - Quality Control Procedural Clarifications and Federal Access to State Systems (Dec. 30, ) QCPolicyMemo – Integrity of the SNAP Quality Control System (Jan.

20, ) QCPolicyMemo - Integrity of the Quality Control Review Process (Aug. 1, ) Quality Control Forms. FNS - Worksheet for SNAP Quality.

Source: Urban Institutefrom AFDC Quality Control Survey, HHS documents, CRS benefits survey, and other sources. For a family of three. Benefit levels relative to poverty vary across family size. For a family of three. The maximum income a family can receive and remain eligible for AFDC after one year of working.

AFDC receipt may also have noneconomic effects. If, for example, the alternative to receiving AFDC is child care of substandard quality, then the additional time in maternal care that AFDC receipt permits may offer a better alternative for children.

PRWORA furthered a trend started earlier in the decade under so called "waiver" programs-state experiments with different types of AFDC rules-toward devolution of design and control of social welfare programs from the federal government to the states.

AFDC, EA, and JOBS: AFDC provided income support to families with children deprived of parental support. JOBS was an employment and training program for AFDC recipients.

Emergency Assistance (EA) provided short term emergency services and benefits to needy families. Food Quality and Safety Systems - A Training Manual on Food Hygiene and the Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) System Table of Contents Food Quality and Standards Service Food and Nutrition Division FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome, Editing, design, graphics and desktop publishing.

Poverty remains significant after they control for other background factors, such as maternal education and test scores, race, the quality of the home environ- ment, marital status, age of the mother at the child's birth, and the child's early physical and health status.

tion, however, the statutory basis of AFDC administration has pro-vided only limited guidelines and frequently makes no explicit refer-ence to key administrative topics.

According to some observers, a lack of specific Congressional direction, and a history of local control over welfare programs have contributed to a decentralized AFDC pro. The same controversy has arisen over the efficacy of earlier state-level reforms. From throughindividual states obtained a spate of "waivers" from the U.S.

Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to modify the parameters of the Aid for Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) program.

Housing and Welfare Reform: 2 Center on Budget and Policy Priorities tabulations of AFDC Quality Control Data. Because these figures have some margin of error, small differences between states should not be treated as significant. End Notes: 1. The new housing law will convert all Section 8 tenant-based subsidies to vouchers starting.

(Sec. ) Provides for offering working AFDC families a supplement if certain earned income disregard provisions are applied in order to guarantee child care.

Title IV: Provisions with Multi-Program Applicability - Revises current JOBS performance standards and AFDC quality control and management information system provisions. largest AFDC component, covering about 80 percent of current cases.

With data from the National Integrated Quality Control System we first trace changes in the Wisconsin AFDC caseload from through The total caseload has declined remarkably in Wisconsin during this period of substantial growth in the number of recipients nationwide.

Study of Welfare Benefits of Families in the AFDC Program Act does not included adoption or approval information, but it was included in the ALEC Sourcebook of American State Legislation.

ALEC has attempted to distance itself from this piece of legislation after the launch of inbut it has done nothing to get it repealed in the states where it previously pushed for.

The most fundamental and far-reaching reform of the traditional cash welfare system for single mothers sincePRWORA replaced the federal entitlement program for low-income families and children (Aid to Families with Dependent Children, AFDC) with a program financed by state-administered block grants, the Temporary Assistance for Needy.

The terms ‘quality control’ and ‘quality assurance’ are often used incorrectly. The definitions of QC and QA in Box will be used for the purposes of good practice guidance. BOX DEFINITION OF QA/QC Quality Control (QC) is a system of routine technical activities, to measure and control the quality of the inventory as it is being.

Both of these characteristics increase the likelihood of being among the poorest AFDC recipients. As Congress considers welfare reform, it may need to explore preventive strategies aimed at discouraging young mothers from being dependent on welfare and encouraging self .Trends in AFDC Participation Rates: The Implications for Welfare Reform Gary D.

Sandefur Congress justified the recent reform of federal welfare policy in part by citing the increase in the the racial composition of the caseload come from the National Integrated Quality Control System. Quality.the old AFDC limit.

The reform also provides more generous non-monetary ben-efits than did AFDC, including guaranteed 2 years of transitional Medicaid cov-erage compared with AFDC’s 1 year, and 2 years of child-care assistance for fam-ilies whose income was below 75 percent of the state’s median compared with AFDC’s 1 year.